Essay 13
Congressional reapportionment is the process by which the government redistributes the population of the congressional districts, based on information taken during the census. It is important to states because it can potentially change the balance of power in Congress, and remove a congressman from a liberal state, and give the seat to a conservative one.
Redistricing is a very similar process, but instead of changing which state gets seats in congress, it re-draws the lines of the congressional districts.
Gerrymandering can allow a congressman, and his aides to choose who will vote for them, by choosing/ realigning the districts in their favor. Another congressmen use Gerrymandering is to help other people with similar interests wind up getting elected in a highly malleable district which would vote for them.
One limit the supreme court has placed on redistricting is that districts must be equally populated, or as close as one can get to equal. They have also forbidden it from limiting minority voting strength.
Essay 14
Mandatory Spending: Federal programs which have been established by Congress. This limits the president's power in Congress because there is no working around Mandatory Spending, so the president needs to compromise, and give in to congressional decisions on Mandatory Spending.
Lame Duck: An official who has not been re-elected, and is simply waiting until his replacement, who was elected comes in to take his position. Lame Duck's limit presidential power because they no longer need to worry about re-election, and simply vote as they believe, often in opposition to the president.
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Monday, March 17, 2014
Oil Spill annotated bibliography
"The Spill"
Frontline
Frontline, February 25, 2013
Internet
3/17/14
In the last ten years, BP has rapidly expanded it's production, and refining of oil; and also it's brand recognition. Despite their new size, or maybe because of it, failed to meet safety regulations, and caused a number of deaths. Several reputable sources say that the company itself was to blame, as opposed to individual workers. The Texas refinery incident, and the Alaska incident point to something seriously wrong with the structure of BP.
"Blowout: The Deepwater Horizon Disaster"
CBS News
CBS News, May 16, 2010
internet
3/17/14
The destroyed oil rig is still spewing oil; no one knows exactly how much, but there are at least several million gallons. Eleven men were killed in the explosion that caused the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon. A source says that the malfunction of the rig was guaranteed, as it had been building up for several weeks.
"BP Oil Spill Conviction: One Down- More To Go"
The Seattle Times
The Seattle Times, March 17, 2014
Internet
3/17/14
Former BP employee was found guilty for obstructing justice/ destroying evidence that would have proven that the oil spill was worse than BP executives were claiming. This is the first of (hopefully) four convictions for several people involved with the BP oil spill in the Gulf Of Mexico. Kurt Mix (the convicted) deleted several hundred text messages from his phone, and faces a maximum sentence of twenty years with a $250,000 fine. The explosion caused eleven deaths, and an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the water.
Frontline
Frontline, February 25, 2013
Internet
3/17/14
In the last ten years, BP has rapidly expanded it's production, and refining of oil; and also it's brand recognition. Despite their new size, or maybe because of it, failed to meet safety regulations, and caused a number of deaths. Several reputable sources say that the company itself was to blame, as opposed to individual workers. The Texas refinery incident, and the Alaska incident point to something seriously wrong with the structure of BP.
"Blowout: The Deepwater Horizon Disaster"
CBS News
CBS News, May 16, 2010
internet
3/17/14
The destroyed oil rig is still spewing oil; no one knows exactly how much, but there are at least several million gallons. Eleven men were killed in the explosion that caused the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon. A source says that the malfunction of the rig was guaranteed, as it had been building up for several weeks.
"BP Oil Spill Conviction: One Down- More To Go"
The Seattle Times
The Seattle Times, March 17, 2014
Internet
3/17/14
Former BP employee was found guilty for obstructing justice/ destroying evidence that would have proven that the oil spill was worse than BP executives were claiming. This is the first of (hopefully) four convictions for several people involved with the BP oil spill in the Gulf Of Mexico. Kurt Mix (the convicted) deleted several hundred text messages from his phone, and faces a maximum sentence of twenty years with a $250,000 fine. The explosion caused eleven deaths, and an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the water.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
Essay 12
A divided government has a reputation of not getting much done, and the lack of accomplishment in our government generally tends to decrease the trust that the general police has in their government; a divided government is when on party controls the house, and the other controls one (or both) houses.
The increased amount of campaign donations, and the increase of money spent on campaigns has led people to see the presidential (and all other) elections as nothing more than money fights between rich, old, white men. Knowing how rich the candidates are, and how flippantly they spend their money, makes the general populace view them as a separate species, and lose the little bit of trust they had for the candidates.
One consequence of the decline in trust in government is that fewer people care about politics, and as such, it slants the elections, thus resulting in worse candidates winning elections. Another possible consequence of a lack of governmental trust would be the rise of a movement who (mistakenly) believe themselves more capable of creating a government than centuries of experience, and trial and error; their government would fail quickly, due to the fact that they didn't have a plan, simply a desire to tear down what came before.
The increased amount of campaign donations, and the increase of money spent on campaigns has led people to see the presidential (and all other) elections as nothing more than money fights between rich, old, white men. Knowing how rich the candidates are, and how flippantly they spend their money, makes the general populace view them as a separate species, and lose the little bit of trust they had for the candidates.
One consequence of the decline in trust in government is that fewer people care about politics, and as such, it slants the elections, thus resulting in worse candidates winning elections. Another possible consequence of a lack of governmental trust would be the rise of a movement who (mistakenly) believe themselves more capable of creating a government than centuries of experience, and trial and error; their government would fail quickly, due to the fact that they didn't have a plan, simply a desire to tear down what came before.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)